Guidelines

Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma 2020

 

Summary of changes

The literature for the complete document has been assessed and updated, whenever relevant. Conclusions and recommendations have been rephrased and added to throughout the current document.

Key changes for the 2020 print:

  • Section 3.1 – Epidemiology – has been expanded, resulting changes in Figure 3.1 and the addition of two new recommendations

 

3.4 Summary of evidence and recommendations for epidemiology, aetiology and pathology

 

Summary of evidenceLE
Aristolochic acid and smoking exposure increases the risk for UTUC.2
Patients with Lynch syndrome are at risk for UTUC.3

 

Recommendations Strength rating
Evaluate patient and family history based on the Amsterdam criteria to identify patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Weak
Evaluate patient exposure to smoking and aristolochic acid.Weak

 

  • Chapter 6 – Prognosis – additional information has been added, resulting in changes to Figure 6.1 and an additional recommendation.

 

6.7 Summary of evidence and guidelines for prognosis

 

Summary of evidenceLE
Chronological age should not preclude radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent, where indicated.3
Important prognostic factors include hydronephrosis, tumour multifocality, size, stage, grade, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion and variant histology.3

 

Recommendations Strength rating
Use pre-operative factors to risk-stratify patients for therapeutic guidance.Weak

 

  • Chapter 7 – Disease management, has been restructured, including new information on adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies. Both Figures 7.1 and 7.2 have been adapted and a number of new recommendations have been added.

 

7.1.6 Summary of evidence and guidelines for management of high-risk non-metastatic UTUC

 

Summary of evidenceLE
Failure to completely remove the bladder cuff increases the risk of bladder cancer recurrence.3
Lymphadenectomy improves survival in muscle-invasive UTUC.3
Peri-operative chemotherapy may improve survival.3
Single post-operative intravesical instillation of chemotherapy lowers the bladder cancer recurrence rate.1

 

Recommendations Strength rating
Perform radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with high-risk non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).Strong
Perform open RNU in non-organ-confined UTUC.Weak
Remove the bladder cuff in its entirety.Strong
Perform a template-based lymphadenectomy in patients with muscle-invasive UTUC.Strong
Offer peri-operative chemotherapy to patients with muscle-invasive UTUC.Weak
Deliver a post-operative bladder instillation of chemotherapy to lower the intravesical recurrence rate.Strong

 

  • Section 7.2 – Metastatic disease has been expanded to include the latest information on immunotherapy, both in a first- and second-line setting, resulting in a new summary table.

 

7.2.4 Summary of evidence and guidelines for the treatment of metastatic UTUC

 

Summary of evidenceLE
Radical nephroureterectomy may improve quality of life and oncologic outcomes in select metastatic patients.3
Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy can improve median survival.2
Single-agent and carboplatin-based combination chemotherapy are less effective than cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in terms of complete response and survival.3
Non-platinum combination chemotherapy has not been tested against standard chemotherapy in patients who are fit or unfit for cisplatin combination chemotherapy.4
PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab has been approved for patients that have progressed during or after previous platinum-based chemotherapy based on the results of a phase III trial.1b
PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab has been FDA approved for patients that have progressed during or after previous platinum-based chemotherapy based on the results of a phase II trial.2a
PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab has been approved for patients that have progressed during or after previous platinum-based chemotherapy based on the results of a phase II trial.2a
PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab has been approved for patients with advanced or metastatic UC ineligible for cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy based on the results of a phase II trial but use of pembrolizumab is restricted to PD-L1 positive patients.2a
PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab has been approved for patients with advanced or metastatic UC ineligible for cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy based on the results of a phase II trial but use of atezolizumab is restricted to PD-L1 positive patients.2a

 

Recommendations Strength rating
Offer radical nephroureterectomy as a palliative treatment to symptomatic patients with resectable locally advanced tumours.Weak
First-line treatment for cisplatin-eligible patients
Use cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy with GC, MVAC, preferably with G-CSF, HD-MVAC with G-CSF or PCG.Strong
Do not offer carboplatin and non-platinum combination chemotherapy.Strong
First-line treatment in patients unfit for cisplatin
Offer checkpoint inhibitors pembrolizumab or atezolizumab depending on PDL-1 status.Weak
Offer carboplatin combination chemotherapy if PD-L1 is negative.Strong
Second-line treatment
Offer checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab) to patients with disease progression during or after platinum-based combination chemotherapy for metastatic disease.Strong
Offer checkpoint inhibitor (atezolizumab) to patients with disease progression during or after platinum-based combination chemotherapy for metastatic disease.Weak
Only offer vinflunine to patients for metastatic disease as second-line treatment if immunotherapy or combination chemotherapy is not feasible. Alternatively, offer vinflunine as third- or subsequent-treatment line.Weak

GC = gemcitabine plus cisplatin; G-CSF = granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; HD-MVAC = high-dose methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin plus cisplatin; PD-L1 = programmed death ligand 1; PCG = paclitaxel, cisplatin, gemcitabine.